Core m3-7Y30 vs i5-5300U
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-5300U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i5-5300U gets 76.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5300U is 1.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i5-5300U gets 76.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5300U is 1.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306d4
Core
Kaby Lake
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /4
TDP
4.5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
76.71k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
17.2k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
14.53k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
3.44k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.12k (x0.72)
TOTAL
25.6k
38.29k (x1.5)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
28.7k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
35.19k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
9.24k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
3.57k (x0.64)
TOTAL
52.78k
76.71k (x1.45)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
2346 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
616 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
238 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
5114 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
5931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
5011 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1076 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
13204 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4