Core m3-7Y30 vs i5-4670K
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-4670K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4670K is 2.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4670K is 2.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake
Haswell
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
4.5 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
42.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
140.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
21.79k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
11.49k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
4.73k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.25k (x0.98)
TOTAL
25.6k
42.25k (x1.65)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
75.9k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
40.88k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
17.08k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
6.32k (x1.14)
TOTAL
52.78k
140.18k (x2.66)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
203 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
1669 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
5735 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
3023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1117 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
11120 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4