| | | | | | |

Core m3-7Y30 vs i3-4030U


Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.

Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
40651
Core
Kaby Lake
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4.5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
46.09k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
10.69k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
6.16k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
2.49k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.23k (x0.52)
TOTAL
25.6k
21.57k (x0.84)

Multithread

m3-7Y30

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
21.84k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
15.86k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
5.94k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
2.45k (x0.44)
TOTAL
52.78k
46.09k (x0.87)

Performance/W
m3-7Y30
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
3073 points/W

Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4