Core m3-7Y30 vs Ryzen 5 4500U
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4500U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4500U is 3.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4500U is 3.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake
Renoir
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
4.5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
52.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
194.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
15.37k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
23.02k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
7.74k (x3.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
6.32k (x1.46)
TOTAL
25.6k
52.44k (x2.05)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
52.52k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
99.84k (x4.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
36.42k (x7.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.56k (x1)
TOTAL
52.78k
194.34k (x3.68)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
3502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
6656 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
2428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
370 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
12956 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
3842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1935 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
13111 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4