| | | | | | |

Core m3-7Y30 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
4.5 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
198.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
14.2k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
23.23k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
5.35k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
5.18k (x1.2)
TOTAL
25.6k
47.96k (x1.87)

Multithread

m3-7Y30

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
58.24k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
105.72k (x5.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
28.73k (x5.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.59k (x1)
TOTAL
52.78k
198.27k (x3.76)

Performance/W
m3-7Y30
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4