Core m3-7Y30 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake
Dali
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4.5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
9.33k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
17.1k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
3.57k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.26k (x0.76)
TOTAL
25.6k
33.26k (x1.3)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
22.14k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
40.04k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
10.71k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5k (x0.9)
TOTAL
52.78k
77.88k (x1.48)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4