Core m3-7Y30 vs A6 9220e
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1.8 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1.8 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
670f00
Core
Kaby Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
4.5 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2016
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
29.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
7.84k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
10.54k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
2.27k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
1.7k (x0.39)
TOTAL
25.6k
22.34k (x0.87)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
11.42k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
12.58k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
3.62k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
1.77k (x0.32)
TOTAL
52.78k
29.39k (x0.56)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
4898 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4