Core m3-7Y30 vs i3-1115G4
Description
The m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 2.6 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the m3-7Y30 gets a score of 52.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 2.6 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1515
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
4.5 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.6k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.78k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
m3-7Y30
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
24.25k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
9.22k
21.63k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
9.09k (x4.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
7.23k (x1.68)
TOTAL
25.6k
62.19k (x2.43)
Multithread
m3-7Y30
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.75k
56.9k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.51k
55.68k (x2.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
19.29k (x3.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
6.09k (x1.09)
TOTAL
52.78k
137.96k (x2.61)
Performance/W
m3-7Y30
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4832 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4557 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1104 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1236 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
11730 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
m3-7Y30
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3852 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3547 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
786 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1659 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
9844 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4