Core i9-9900KF vs i7-10750H
Description
The i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900KF gets a score of 592.9 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.7 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900KF gets a score of 592.9 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.7 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
84.54k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
592.86k points
349.21k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.03k
29.06k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
29.52k
26.49k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.55k
6.23k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
13.89k (x0.9)
TOTAL
84.54k
75.67k (x0.89)
Multithread
i9-9900KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
276.22k
154.61k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
250.61k
151.34k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
57.2k
36.33k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.84k
6.93k (x0.78)
TOTAL
592.86k
349.21k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i9-9900KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2638 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
6241 points/W
7760 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6605 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3090 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
16909 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4