| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.7 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
2.59k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
9.5k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
3.15k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
5.9k (x0.43)
TOTAL
45.53k
21.13k (x0.46)

Multithread

i9-9900K

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
21.09k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
80.93k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
30.76k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
8.51k (x0.95)
TOTAL
266.82k
141.3k (x0.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
16.86k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
12.08k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
3.37k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
6.29k (x0.42)
TOTAL
81.91k
38.61k (x0.47)

Multithread

i9-9900K

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
150.99k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
118.54k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
33.44k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
8.6k (x0.7)
TOTAL
529.32k
311.57k (x0.59)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4