| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.9 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
50654
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
October 2018
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
3k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
12.29k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
3.64k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
6.55k (x0.48)
TOTAL
45.53k
25.46k (x0.56)

Multithread

i9-9900K

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
20.42k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
95.83k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
30.88k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
9.7k (x1.08)
TOTAL
266.82k
156.83k (x0.59)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
18.78k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
16.25k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
3.99k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
6.8k (x0.45)
TOTAL
81.91k
45.82k (x0.56)

Multithread

i9-9900K

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
133.55k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
108.43k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
30.02k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
9.48k (x0.78)
TOTAL
529.32k
281.48k (x0.53)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4