| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 402.4 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1.4 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
306e4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
10 /20
TDP
95 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
October 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-9900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
18.03k
11.96k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
10.73k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.86k
4.59k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.5k
4.31k (x0.3)
TOTAL
65.37k
31.6k (x0.48)

Multithread

i9-9900K

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
131.34k
218.24k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
204.76k
206.92k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.74k
100.37k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.99k
11.45k (x1.27)
TOTAL
400.83k
536.99k (x1.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
10.55k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
10.02k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
3.99k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
3.66k (x0.27)
TOTAL
65.24k
28.23k (x0.43)

Multithread

i9-9900K

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
215.04k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
230.43k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
96.87k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
8.76k (x0.98)
TOTAL
402.41k
551.1k (x1.37)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1378 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2195 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
4236 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3596 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5408 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2720 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
13049 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4