| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.3 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
18/36
TDP
95 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25344 kB
Date
October 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
4.52k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
17.94k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
5.5k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
9.64k (x0.7)
TOTAL
45.53k
37.6k (x0.83)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
84.93k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
409.55k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
122.88k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
22.12k (x2.47)
TOTAL
266.82k
639.48k (x2.4)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
18.03k
16.03k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
23.95k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.86k
6.03k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.5k
9.37k (x0.65)
TOTAL
65.37k
55.38k (x0.85)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
131.34k
316.11k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
204.76k
503.75k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.74k
131.82k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.99k
22.24k (x2.47)
TOTAL
400.83k
973.92k (x2.43)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
16.4k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
20.97k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
5.82k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
8.86k (x0.65)
TOTAL
65.24k
52.05k (x0.8)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
316.84k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
461.09k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
129.82k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
22.09k (x2.48)
TOTAL
402.41k
929.85k (x2.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
29.53k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
22.59k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
5.99k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
10.22k (x0.68)
TOTAL
81.91k
68.33k (x0.83)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
587.06k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
496.41k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
134.66k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
22.99k (x1.88)
TOTAL
529.32k
1241.12k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4