| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i9-10900K


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.3 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0655
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.03k
19.5k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
28.01k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.86k
7.45k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.5k
15.82k (x1.09)
TOTAL
65.37k
70.79k (x1.08)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
131.34k
194.49k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
204.76k
312.59k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.74k
89.14k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.99k
12.58k (x1.4)
TOTAL
400.83k
608.81k (x1.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
32.67k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
28.49k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
6.53k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
12.72k (x0.85)
TOTAL
81.91k
80.41k (x0.98)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
307.39k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
298.47k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
72.94k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
6.85k (x0.56)
TOTAL
529.32k
685.65k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4