| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.2 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
431.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
4.25k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
19.72k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
5.84k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
21.36k (x1.55)
TOTAL
45.53k
51.17k (x1.12)

Multithread

i9-9900K

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
35.04k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
181.42k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
64.86k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
8.21k (x0.92)
TOTAL
266.82k
289.54k (x1.09)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-9900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.03k
15.22k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
24.12k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.86k
5.87k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.5k
21k (x1.45)
TOTAL
65.37k
66.21k (x1.01)

Multithread

i9-9900K

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
131.34k
126.81k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
204.76k
229.86k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.74k
61.74k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.99k
9.77k (x1.09)
TOTAL
400.83k
428.19k (x1.07)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
14.44k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
24.92k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
5.8k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
19.07k (x1.4)
TOTAL
65.24k
64.24k (x0.98)

Multithread

i9-9900K

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
122.01k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
220.34k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
59.89k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
9.9k (x1.11)
TOTAL
402.41k
412.13k (x1.02)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
15.34k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
25.75k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
5.79k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
17.95k (x1.2)
TOTAL
81.91k
64.83k (x0.79)

Multithread

i9-9900K

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
123.07k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
239.3k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
60.6k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
8.18k (x0.67)
TOTAL
529.32k
431.14k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
4106 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4