| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.3 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
410.47k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
4.14k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
19.07k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
5.77k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
18.28k (x1.33)
TOTAL
45.53k
47.26k (x1.04)

Multithread

i9-9900K

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
34.48k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
169.65k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
63.68k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
8.2k (x0.92)
TOTAL
266.82k
276.01k (x1.03)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
15.11k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
23.46k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
5.64k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
17.52k (x1.29)
TOTAL
65.24k
61.72k (x0.95)

Multithread

i9-9900K

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
119.5k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
198.79k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
59.75k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
11.58k (x1.3)
TOTAL
402.41k
389.62k (x0.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
15.02k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
24.26k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
5.53k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
16.26k (x1.09)
TOTAL
81.91k
61.07k (x0.75)

Multithread

i9-9900K

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
122.92k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
220.32k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
59.78k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
7.44k (x0.61)
TOTAL
529.32k
410.47k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4