Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.9 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.9 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Barcelo
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
18.57k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
22.03k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
9.55k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
20.5k (x1.37)
TOTAL
81.91k
70.65k (x0.86)
Multithread
i9-9900K
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
92.92k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
128.4k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
54.82k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
5.13k (x0.42)
TOTAL
529.32k
281.26k (x0.53)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4