Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
October 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
4.2k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
17.36k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
7.5k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
23.79k (x1.73)
TOTAL
45.53k
52.85k (x1.16)
Multithread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
22.11k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
108.04k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
56.81k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
36.39k (x4.06)
TOTAL
266.82k
223.36k (x0.84)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
18.03k
15.38k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
21.94k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.86k
7.97k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.5k
24.76k (x1.71)
TOTAL
65.37k
70.05k (x1.07)
Multithread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
131.34k
96.91k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
204.76k
135.12k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.74k
70.39k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.99k
56.43k (x6.28)
TOTAL
400.83k
358.85k (x0.9)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
15.04k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
20.95k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
8.57k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
21.71k (x1.6)
TOTAL
65.24k
66.27k (x1.02)
Multithread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
94.36k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
141.73k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
69.38k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
32.72k (x3.67)
TOTAL
402.41k
338.19k (x0.84)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
16.04k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
24.47k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
8.38k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
21.66k (x1.45)
TOTAL
81.91k
70.55k (x0.86)
Multithread
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
113.63k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
143.55k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
63.84k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
27.34k (x2.24)
TOTAL
529.32k
348.35k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4