| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i3-1215U


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.9 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
906a4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
10240 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
185.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
6.95k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
20.22k
16.28k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
10.49k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.78k
9.95k (x0.72)
TOTAL
45.53k
43.67k (x0.96)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.39k
14.97k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
166.55k
51.01k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.92k
30.47k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
8.59k (x0.96)
TOTAL
266.82k
105.05k (x0.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.03k
20.87k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
20.74k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.86k
11.32k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.5k
8.32k (x0.57)
TOTAL
65.37k
61.26k (x0.94)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
131.34k
45.12k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
204.76k
60.59k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.74k
28.48k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.99k
14.06k (x1.56)
TOTAL
400.83k
148.26k (x0.37)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.98k
15.63k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
27.04k
20.2k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.63k
9.94k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
8.06k (x0.59)
TOTAL
65.24k
53.83k (x0.83)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.88k
35.72k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
208.5k
56.41k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.12k
25k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.91k
12.48k (x1.4)
TOTAL
402.41k
129.6k (x0.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
37.56k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
21.13k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
11.35k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
10.31k (x0.69)
TOTAL
81.91k
80.34k (x0.98)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
73.97k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
72.37k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
29.61k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
9.65k (x0.79)
TOTAL
529.32k
185.6k (x0.35)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4