Core i9-9900K vs i9-11900K
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i9-11900K gets 788.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.5 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i9-11900K gets 788.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.5 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0671
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
106.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
788.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
38.06k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
31.54k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
13.5k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
23.3k (x1.56)
TOTAL
81.91k
106.41k (x1.3)
Multithread
i9-9900K
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
327.93k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
329.16k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
118.88k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
12.98k (x1.06)
TOTAL
529.32k
788.94k (x1.49)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
2623 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
2633 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
951 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
6312 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
7182 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
4397 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
20077 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4