Core i9-9900K vs i5-11400F
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 529.3 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0671
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.91k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
529.32k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
32.08k
31.66k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
26.21k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
11.96k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
18.5k (x1.24)
TOTAL
81.91k
88.34k (x1.08)
Multithread
i9-9900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
242.98k
210.36k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
220.16k
203.84k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.97k
72.05k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.22k
9.4k (x0.77)
TOTAL
529.32k
495.65k (x0.94)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2558 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2317 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
568 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
5572 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6417 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5634 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2996 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
16382 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4