| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Xeon E5-2680 v4


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.1 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
406f1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
95 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
35840 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
1162.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
17.8k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
16.51k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
4.47k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
2.56k (x0.17)
TOTAL
86.24k
41.35k (x0.48)

Multithread

i9-9900K

E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
494.82k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
514.13k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
132.87k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
20.8k (x1.12)
TOTAL
545.3k
1162.63k (x2.13)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
9689 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4