| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i7-10750H


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.69k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
18.71k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
5.84k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.32k
13.95k (x0.91)
TOTAL
48.66k
43.19k (x0.89)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
18.79k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
155.68k
86.1k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51k
27.42k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.26k
5.27k (x0.29)
TOTAL
263.38k
137.58k (x0.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
29.06k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
26.49k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
6.23k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
13.89k (x0.9)
TOTAL
86.24k
75.67k (x0.88)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
154.61k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
151.34k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
36.33k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
6.93k (x0.37)
TOTAL
545.3k
349.21k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4