| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 3.8 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.05k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
15.29k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
9.04k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.32k
10.54k (x0.69)
TOTAL
48.66k
38.92k (x0.8)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
9.05k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
155.68k
33.88k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51k
15.34k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.26k
6.74k (x0.37)
TOTAL
263.38k
65.01k (x0.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
25.53k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
19.99k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
9.31k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
10.81k (x0.7)
TOTAL
86.24k
65.64k (x0.76)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
58.46k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
57.31k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
20.1k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
6.81k (x0.37)
TOTAL
545.3k
142.69k (x0.26)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4