Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a40f41
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
21.04k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
22.41k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
10.21k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
24.27k (x1.57)
TOTAL
86.24k
77.93k (x0.9)
Multithread
i9-9900K
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
158.65k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
215.86k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
89.45k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
14.77k (x0.8)
TOTAL
545.3k
478.73k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4