| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 5700G


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5700G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the 5700G gets 484.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the 5700G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
84.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
484.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
22.99k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
25.24k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
11.56k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
24.7k (x1.6)
TOTAL
86.24k
84.49k (x0.98)

Multithread

i9-9900K

5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
159.36k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
215.57k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
98.78k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
10.4k (x0.56)
TOTAL
545.3k
484.11k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
3316 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
1520 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
7448 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
4998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5487 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
5369 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
18367 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4