| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i5-12400F


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
90675
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
7.43k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
18.64k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
13.15k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.32k
14.82k (x0.97)
TOTAL
48.66k
54.04k (x1.11)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
36.23k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
155.68k
134.76k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51k
84.06k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.26k
16.71k (x0.92)
TOTAL
263.38k
271.76k (x1.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
33.85k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
20.33k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
10.51k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
11.77k (x0.76)
TOTAL
86.24k
76.46k (x0.89)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
174.21k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
141.31k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
64.86k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
19.01k (x1.03)
TOTAL
545.3k
399.39k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4