| | | | | | |

Core i9-9900K vs i3-12100T


Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.6 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
90675
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
330.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-9900K
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
6.88k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
17.36k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
12.26k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.32k
13.49k (x0.88)
TOTAL
48.66k
49.98k (x1.03)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
22.03k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
155.68k
84.16k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51k
46.49k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.26k
8.96k (x0.49)
TOTAL
263.38k
161.65k (x0.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
43.24k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
23.76k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
12.67k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
13.88k (x0.9)
TOTAL
86.24k
93.54k (x1.08)

Multithread

i9-9900K

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
150.28k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
126.29k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
45.32k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
8.73k (x0.47)
TOTAL
545.3k
330.62k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i9-9900K
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4