Core i9-9900K vs i7-11700F
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 545.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0671
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
86.24k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
545.3k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.62k
32.55k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
30.02k
26.95k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
10.76k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.43k
19.32k (x1.25)
TOTAL
86.24k
89.58k (x1.04)
Multithread
i9-9900K
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
248.93k
232.06k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
224.43k
203.56k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.39k
72.89k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.54k
3.81k (x0.21)
TOTAL
545.3k
512.32k (x0.94)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2362 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
562 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
195 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5740 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6724 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6003 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1434 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3087 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
17247 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4