Core i9-9880H vs E5-2620 v3
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
18.64k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
10.55k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
4.12k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
2.54k (x0.18)
TOTAL
73.53k
35.86k (x0.49)
Multithread
i9-9880H
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
181.66k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
122.09k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
47.02k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
7.22k (x1.7)
TOTAL
381.53k
357.99k (x0.94)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4