Core i9-9880H vs i5-10400F
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0655
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2019
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
28.39k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
24.89k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
5.78k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
13.19k (x0.93)
TOTAL
73.53k
72.25k (x0.98)
Multithread
i9-9880H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
180.2k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
163.51k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
40.6k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
6.48k (x1.53)
TOTAL
381.53k
390.78k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4