Core i9-9880H vs i5-10210U
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 2.6 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 2.6 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
23.11k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
20.58k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
4.73k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
7.43k (x0.52)
TOTAL
73.53k
55.86k (x0.76)
Multithread
i9-9880H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
65.84k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
60.77k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
14.45k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.44k (x1.05)
TOTAL
381.53k
145.51k (x0.38)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4