Core i9-9880H vs Ryzen 7 5700G
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5700G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 5700G gets 484.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.3 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 5700G gets 484.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.3 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
84.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
484.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
22.99k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
25.24k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
11.56k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
24.7k (x1.74)
TOTAL
73.53k
84.49k (x1.15)
Multithread
i9-9880H
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
159.36k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
215.57k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
98.78k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
10.4k (x2.46)
TOTAL
381.53k
484.11k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
3316 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
1520 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
7448 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
4998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
5487 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
5369 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
18367 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4