Core i9-9880H vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
497.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
17.1k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
26.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
8.91k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
23.21k (x1.64)
TOTAL
73.53k
75.81k (x1.03)
Multithread
i9-9880H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
172.04k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
214.03k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
97.1k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
14.57k (x3.44)
TOTAL
381.53k
497.74k (x1.3)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4