Core i9-9880H vs i3-12100F
Description
The i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9880H gets a score of 381.5 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
90675
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
73.53k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
381.53k points
340.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
27.81k
39.54k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
23.79k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
11.96k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.19k
13.52k (x0.95)
TOTAL
73.53k
88.81k (x1.21)
Multithread
i9-9880H
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
175.69k
148k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
166.56k
123.08k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.04k
52.73k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
16.67k (x3.94)
TOTAL
381.53k
340.49k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3904 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3701 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
779 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
8478 points/W
5871 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5793 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5392 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2956 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4