| | | | | | |

Core i9-7980XE vs i5-10400F


Description
The i9-7980XE is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-7980XE gets a score of 1223.8 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 3.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a0653
Core
Skylake-X
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
18/36
6/12
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.43k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
1223.79k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-7980XE
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.89k
4.3k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
16.56k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
5.25k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.81k
12.61k (x1.29)
TOTAL
40.82k
38.72k (x0.95)

Multithread

i9-7980XE

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
79.8k
18.1k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
372.72k
79.16k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121.42k
26.75k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.48k
13.81k (x0.52)
TOTAL
600.43k
137.82k (x0.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-7980XE
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
31.16k
26.28k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
28.13k
23.38k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
5.52k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.5k
12.96k (x1.23)
TOTAL
76.43k
68.14k (x0.89)

Multithread

i9-7980XE

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
560.19k
163.67k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
516.97k
159.74k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.94k
39k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.69k
7.56k (x0.33)
TOTAL
1223.79k
369.97k (x0.3)

Performance/W
i9-7980XE
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3395 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3133 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
751 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
137 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7417 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-7980XE
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7081 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6392 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1512 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2386 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
17371 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4