| | | | | | |

Core i9-7980XE vs i5-10300H


Description
The i9-7980XE is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-7980XE gets a score of 1223.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 5 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a0652
Core
Skylake-X
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/8
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.43k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
1223.79k points
246.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-7980XE
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.16k
27.14k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
28.13k
24.75k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
5.73k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.5k
11.84k (x1.13)
TOTAL
76.43k
69.47k (x0.91)

Multithread

i9-7980XE

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
560.19k
105.77k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
516.97k
107.47k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.94k
24.82k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.69k
8.02k (x0.35)
TOTAL
1223.79k
246.07k (x0.2)

Performance/W
i9-7980XE
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3395 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3133 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
751 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
137 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
7417 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-7980XE
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
7081 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6392 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1512 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2386 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
17371 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4