Core i9-10980XE vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 929.8 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 929.8 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
306e4
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
18/36
10 /20
TDP
165 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
25600 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
7.26k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
6.9k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
2.77k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
2.55k (x0.29)
TOTAL
52.05k
19.48k (x0.37)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
180.2k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
191.43k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
80.22k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
7.46k (x0.34)
TOTAL
929.85k
459.31k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1920 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2794 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
787 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
5635 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3417 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4369 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1845 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
10844 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4