| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i9-10900X


Description
Both models i9-10980XE and i9-10900X are based on Cascade Lake architecture.

Cascade Lake is a architecture focused on high-end CPUs that uses the 14nm process. There are i9 and Xeon models using 4 different cores: Cascade Lake-SP and Cascade Lake-AP for servers, Cascade Lake-W for workstations and Cascade Lake-X for home high-end Pcs.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2 times faster than the i9-10900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
50657
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
18/36
10/20
TDP
165 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
19712 kB
Date
November 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
632.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
25.97k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
22.37k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.3k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
8.63k (x0.84)
TOTAL
68.33k
62.28k (x0.91)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
281.98k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
259.01k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
64.87k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
26.5k (x1.15)
TOTAL
1241.12k
632.35k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
3832 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4