Core i9-10980XE vs i7-9750H
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.5 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.5 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
906ed
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
18/36
6/12
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
276.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.53k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
18.24k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.76k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
13.01k (x1.35)
TOTAL
37.6k
41.54k (x1.1)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
24.3k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
97.88k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
29.85k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
11.93k (x0.54)
TOTAL
639.48k
163.95k (x0.26)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
16.32k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
23.42k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
6.04k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
13.24k (x1.41)
TOTAL
55.38k
59.03k (x1.07)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
86.92k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
126.14k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
29.62k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
11.86k (x0.53)
TOTAL
973.92k
254.54k (x0.26)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
16.31k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
24.48k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.87k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
13.02k (x1.47)
TOTAL
52.05k
59.67k (x1.15)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
87.54k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
131.05k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
28.47k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
11.8k (x0.53)
TOTAL
929.85k
258.87k (x0.28)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
25.22k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
21.97k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.02k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
10.71k (x1.05)
TOTAL
68.33k
62.92k (x0.92)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
125.56k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
115.86k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
25.63k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
9.4k (x0.41)
TOTAL
1241.12k
276.46k (x0.22)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
6144 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4