| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i7-4790


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-4790 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.1 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
306c3
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/8
TDP
165 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
44.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
173.89k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.51k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
11.24k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.03k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
5.02k (x0.52)
TOTAL
37.6k
25.8k (x0.69)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
15.72k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
54.99k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
23.87k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
5.48k (x0.25)
TOTAL
639.48k
100.06k (x0.16)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
13.52k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
11.94k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
4.96k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
4.84k (x0.52)
TOTAL
55.38k
35.25k (x0.64)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
54.7k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
52.41k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
24.5k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
6.77k (x0.3)
TOTAL
973.92k
138.37k (x0.14)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
14.07k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
12.63k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.35k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
4.98k (x0.56)
TOTAL
52.05k
37.03k (x0.71)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
57.88k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
60.83k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
24.4k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
6.95k (x0.31)
TOTAL
929.85k
150.07k (x0.16)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
22.19k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
12.45k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.11k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
4.98k (x0.49)
TOTAL
68.33k
44.73k (x0.65)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
87.14k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
58k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
22.75k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
6k (x0.26)
TOTAL
1241.12k
173.89k (x0.14)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1037 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
691 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
2070 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
5547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
11183 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4