Core i9-10980XE vs i5-9500T
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.5 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.5 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
906ea
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
18/36
6/6
TDP
165 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
9216 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
274.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
3.73k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
15.41k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
4.62k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
10.59k (x1.1)
TOTAL
37.6k
34.35k (x0.91)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
20.82k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
85.48k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
23.21k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
4.11k (x0.19)
TOTAL
639.48k
133.63k (x0.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
12.4k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
18.41k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
4.69k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
10.48k (x1.12)
TOTAL
55.38k
45.98k (x0.83)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
74.86k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
105.88k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
22.34k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
4.01k (x0.18)
TOTAL
973.92k
207.08k (x0.21)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
13.46k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
20.21k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
4.72k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
10.25k (x1.16)
TOTAL
52.05k
48.64k (x0.93)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
74.65k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
110.86k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
22.08k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
4.12k (x0.19)
TOTAL
929.85k
211.7k (x0.23)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
24.5k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
21.41k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.82k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
10.73k (x1.05)
TOTAL
68.33k
61.46k (x0.9)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
134.63k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
113.61k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
21.71k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
4.07k (x0.18)
TOTAL
1241.12k
274.02k (x0.22)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
7829 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4