| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i5-8500


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-8500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i5-8500 gets 307.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4 times faster than the i5-8500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
906ea
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
18/36
6/6
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
9216 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
69.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
307.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.19k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.38k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.46k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
11.92k (x1.24)
TOTAL
37.6k
38.96k (x1.04)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
27.67k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
94.07k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
29.05k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
4.39k (x0.2)
TOTAL
639.48k
155.18k (x0.24)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
15.22k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
22.02k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
5.75k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
12.17k (x1.3)
TOTAL
55.38k
55.17k (x1)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
87.78k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
126.73k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
32.93k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
4.22k (x0.19)
TOTAL
973.92k
251.65k (x0.26)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
15.21k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
22.94k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.54k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
11.39k (x1.29)
TOTAL
52.05k
55.07k (x1.06)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
79.52k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
107.78k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
31.89k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
13.37k (x0.61)
TOTAL
929.85k
232.55k (x0.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
27.36k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
24.27k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.69k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
11.77k (x1.15)
TOTAL
68.33k
69.09k (x1.01)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
144.77k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
129.04k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
29.53k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
4.18k (x0.18)
TOTAL
1241.12k
307.52k (x0.25)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
2227 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
1985 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
454 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
4731 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
6673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5920 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2870 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
16850 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4