| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i5-8259U


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 5.4 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806ea
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Coffee Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/8
TDP
165 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
54.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
229k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
21.06k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
19.79k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.72k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
8.98k (x0.88)
TOTAL
68.33k
54.55k (x0.8)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
96.43k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
85.46k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
22.31k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
24.81k (x1.08)
TOTAL
1241.12k
229k (x0.18)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
3444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
3052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
797 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
886 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
8179 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
5543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5208 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2363 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
14355 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4