Core i9-10980XE vs i5-5675R
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.4 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.4 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
40671
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Bradwell-H
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/4
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
194.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.14k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
14.35k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
4.94k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
5.47k (x0.57)
TOTAL
37.6k
28.91k (x0.77)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
16.02k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
54.6k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
18.69k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
16.87k (x0.76)
TOTAL
639.48k
106.18k (x0.17)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
12.86k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
16.85k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
5.19k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
5.49k (x0.59)
TOTAL
55.38k
40.39k (x0.73)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
50.07k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
64.61k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
19.84k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
17.09k (x0.77)
TOTAL
973.92k
151.6k (x0.16)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
12.88k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
18.27k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.12k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
5.45k (x0.62)
TOTAL
52.05k
41.72k (x0.8)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
49.91k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
70.3k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
19.69k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
16.92k (x0.77)
TOTAL
929.85k
156.83k (x0.17)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
21.91k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
18.59k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.2k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
5.72k (x0.56)
TOTAL
68.33k
51.43k (x0.75)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
84.92k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
72.09k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
20.13k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
17.07k (x0.74)
TOTAL
1241.12k
194.2k (x0.16)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
2988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4