| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
706e5
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/8
TDP
165 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
3.88k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
14.98k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
9.7k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
8.6k (x0.89)
TOTAL
37.6k
37.15k (x0.99)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
14.61k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
54.9k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
27.58k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
5.04k (x0.23)
TOTAL
639.48k
102.13k (x0.16)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
12.89k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
18.55k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
9.93k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
9.54k (x1.02)
TOTAL
55.38k
50.91k (x0.92)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
50.06k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
66.1k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
20.24k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
5.51k (x0.25)
TOTAL
973.92k
141.91k (x0.15)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
13.58k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
19.53k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
9.37k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
9.23k (x1.04)
TOTAL
52.05k
51.7k (x0.99)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
56.25k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
73.73k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
29.56k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
5.39k (x0.24)
TOTAL
929.85k
164.94k (x0.18)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
21.5k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
17.71k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
7.92k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
8.24k (x0.81)
TOTAL
68.33k
55.37k (x0.81)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
73.03k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
68.19k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
24.89k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
5.54k (x0.24)
TOTAL
1241.12k
171.65k (x0.14)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4