| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i5-10300H


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 5 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
a0652
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/8
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
15.65k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
23.13k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.66k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
11.43k (x1.29)
TOTAL
52.05k
55.87k (x1.07)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
26.77k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
43.81k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
10.17k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
11.91k (x0.54)
TOTAL
929.85k
92.66k (x0.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
27.14k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
24.75k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.73k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
11.84k (x1.16)
TOTAL
68.33k
69.47k (x1.02)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
105.77k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
107.47k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
24.82k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
8.02k (x0.35)
TOTAL
1241.12k
246.07k (x0.2)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4