Core i9-10980XE vs i3-9100T
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.4 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.4 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
906eb
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/4
TDP
165 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
192.88k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
3.79k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
15.65k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
4.59k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
7.78k (x0.81)
TOTAL
37.6k
31.81k (x0.85)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
13.97k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
57.83k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
17.03k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
4.35k (x0.2)
TOTAL
639.48k
93.18k (x0.15)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
13.74k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
19.7k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
4.86k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
8.61k (x0.92)
TOTAL
55.38k
46.91k (x0.85)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
50.5k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
72.58k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
18.09k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
4.28k (x0.19)
TOTAL
973.92k
145.45k (x0.15)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
13.6k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
20.58k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
4.76k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
8.8k (x0.99)
TOTAL
52.05k
47.74k (x0.92)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
50.18k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
75.99k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
17.66k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
4.12k (x0.19)
TOTAL
929.85k
147.95k (x0.16)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
24.89k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
21.82k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.83k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
8.63k (x0.84)
TOTAL
68.33k
60.16k (x0.88)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
89.4k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
81.19k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
18.06k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
4.24k (x0.18)
TOTAL
1241.12k
192.88k (x0.16)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
5511 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4