Core i9-10980XE vs i3-10105
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.9 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.9 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a0653
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/8
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.5k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
18.39k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.78k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
8.3k (x0.86)
TOTAL
37.6k
36.97k (x0.98)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
16.13k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
75.62k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
27.88k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
3.57k (x0.16)
TOTAL
639.48k
123.2k (x0.19)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
16.19k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
23.07k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
6.04k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
8.46k (x0.9)
TOTAL
55.38k
53.77k (x0.97)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
57.59k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
100.63k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
28.59k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
3.56k (x0.16)
TOTAL
973.92k
190.38k (x0.2)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
16.11k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
24.12k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.71k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
7.89k (x0.89)
TOTAL
52.05k
53.83k (x1.03)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
58.25k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
105.73k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
27.8k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
3.51k (x0.16)
TOTAL
929.85k
195.29k (x0.21)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
28.9k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
25.85k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.88k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
8.29k (x0.81)
TOTAL
68.33k
68.92k (x1.01)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
111.69k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
110.23k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
28.45k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
3.56k (x0.15)
TOTAL
1241.12k
253.93k (x0.2)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4