| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
810f81
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/8
TDP
165 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
3.78k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
16.42k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
4.75k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
5.51k (x0.57)
TOTAL
37.6k
30.46k (x0.81)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
15.18k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
74.87k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
27.85k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
6.08k (x0.27)
TOTAL
639.48k
123.97k (x0.19)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
13.72k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
22.93k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.99k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
5.27k (x0.52)
TOTAL
68.33k
46.91k (x0.69)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
50.54k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
93.33k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
25.25k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
6.07k (x0.26)
TOTAL
1241.12k
175.18k (x0.14)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4